Scientific Definition
Believing streaks predict future streaks.
Plain-English Definition
Believing streaks predict future streaks.
Feynman Explanation
Three good quarters in a row do not a strategy make.
Core Principle
Believing streaks predict future streaks.
Mechanisms
Believing streaks predict future streaks.
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
Inputs (Triggers)
Pending editorial review.
Outputs (Behaviors)
Pending editorial review.
Behavioral Signature
Three good quarters in a row do not a strategy make.
Examples
- Promoting the executive on a streak; demoting after one bad period.
- Talent decisions made on noise, not signal.
Pending editorial review.
Famous Experiments
Pending editorial review.
Design Principles
- Set evaluation windows in advance. Don't move the goal posts mid-streak.
Measurement Approaches
Pending editorial review.
Evidence
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
The Perverse Incentive Lens™
How this behavior is exploited — and how to redesign around it.
- Set evaluation windows in advance. Don't move the goal posts mid-streak.
Pending editorial review.
Pending editorial review.
Interactive Mini Network
Click any neighbor to re-center the graph and follow the threads of connection.
Knowledge Graph Neighbors
Auto-linked to the rest of the Human Behavior Taxonomy by family, domain, dimension, and shared keywords.
Believing a specific scenario is more likely than its more general one.
Believing past random events influence future independent ones.
We underestimate time and cost; we overestimate benefit.
We prefer known risks to unknown ones, even when the unknown is better.
We ignore underlying probabilities in favor of vivid specifics.
Underestimating the probability of bad outcomes — especially to us.
Overestimating the probability of bad outcomes.
Worst-cases assumed as base-cases because they 'feel responsible.'
We prefer eliminating a small risk completely over reducing a larger one partially.
Systematic deviations from rationality in judgment.
Throwing more in because we already threw a lot in.
Generalizing from winners while ignoring identical losers.