Envy/Jealousy Tendency
We measure ourselves against peers, not against our past selves.
"Munger: 'It's not greed that drives the world, but envy.'"
What is Envy/Jealousy Tendency? We measure ourselves against peers, not against our past selves. Relative status drives more behavior than absolute outcomes.
Comp negotiations driven by what peers earn, not by absolute value.
Relative status drives more behavior than absolute outcomes.
Design comp systems aware of relative comparison, not just absolutes.
Use the model. Pick the move.
We measure ourselves against peers, not against our past selves. You've just seen this: Comp negotiations driven by what peers earn, not by absolute value. Which lever does the model recommend?
Pick a lever. There are no neutral ones — every incentive funds a behavior somewhere.
Pick a reaction to Envy/Jealousy Tendency
One tap. We'll point you at the most useful next surface based on how this hits.
The full taxonomy entry
Every concept in the Atlas uses the same structure — so Envy/Jealousy Tendency can be compared, recombined, and cited like an element on a periodic table.
- Business
- Leadership
- Government
- Healthcare
- Education
- Sales
- Marketing
- AI
- Negotiation
- Media
- Public Policy
- Relationships
- Where in our org would Envy/Jealousy Tendency most often show up unnoticed?
- Which metric, ritual, or contract clause quietly rewards Envy/Jealousy Tendency?
- If we removed every payoff for Envy/Jealousy Tendency, what behavior would replace it?
- Who benefits when Envy/Jealousy Tendency persists — and who pays the cost?
- People defend the status quo using the language of envy/jealousy tendency.
- Decisions cluster around the easiest narrative rather than the strongest evidence.
- New data changes the slide deck but not the decision.
- Anyone naming the pattern is treated as the problem.
Every Atlas entry is a node in a knowledge graph. See the related rail below to follow the connections.
See Envy/Jealousy Tendency through 5 lenses
Each layer of the Incentives OS reframes this concept with its own thinkers, vocabulary, and diagnostic question.
- Layer 6Evolutionary Psychology
What ancestral instinct is being triggered?
- Layer 10Negotiation
Where is the real leverage — and what interests sit behind the stated positions?
- Layer 15AI & Alignment
What proxy reward is the AI optimizing — and what is it ignoring?
- Layer 18Temporal Models
What happens if this incentive compounds for ten years?
- Layer 21Mental Models & Mastery
Which model — or stack of models — are we missing here?
Do you actually know Envy/Jealousy Tendency?
Three quick questions. Result is saved into your review streak — come back when the term is due to lock it in.
Which best describes Envy/Jealousy Tendency?
Worked example, counter-example & concept map
On-demand AI analysis grounded in the Lab's research. Cached on your device after first run.
When you encounter Envy/Jealousy Tendency, your default mode network folds the experience into your ongoing story-of-self — which is why the same fact lands differently depending on who you think you are.
Self-referential thought, mind-wandering, narrative-of-self, mental time travel. Most of your waking thought is this network running scenarios about you, your status, your past, and your future.
See Default Mode in the Brain Atlas →Picked for you, from the Atlas
Ranked by shared learning paths, overlapping chips, and what you've saved.
A group decides on a course of action that nobody actually wants, because everyone assumes others prefer it.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
We attribute our own actions to situations but others' actions to their character.
We favor people who are similar to us or who like us.
Sacrificing for others without expecting a personal reward.
Masking the sponsors of a message to make it appear grassroots.
Send the card, not just the link
A pre-rendered social card with the title, eyebrow, and URL. Copy the link, post it anywhere, or download the SVG for slides.
More definitions to follow
Every term in the Atlas connects to a dozen others. Pick any of these and see where it takes you.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Our perception is shaped by what we selectively pay attention to.
Faces and brands look more appealing in a group than individually.
Retroactive extensions privilege legacy estates over public-domain enrichment.
Interdependent network of actors evolving together.
Output of a process re-enters as input.
Behaving truthfully in transactions and disclosures — measurable and cross-culturally variable.
Giving up after repeated exposure to uncontrollable negative events.
A bias against ideas or products that originated outside the group.
Lowest-bid procurement produces lowest-quality outcomes.
Belief in one's ability to execute.
Goals become the focus, sometimes at the expense of the underlying purpose.