Skip to main content
HBT-COG-0600 · Dimension COG · Cognition

Second-Tier Thinking

Yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems.

Culture·Mental Model·Grade B·draft· enriching…
In one paragraph

Second-Tier Thinking is yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems. It sits in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™ as element HBT-COG-0600, within the Culture family. The core principle: yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems. In incentive terms, it matters because it changes the payoff people perceive before they choose — which means it can be designed for, or exploited.

Scientific Definition

Yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems.

Plain-English Definition

Yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems.

Feynman Explanation

First tier fights about which level is right. Second tier asks what each level is for.

Core Principle

Yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems.

Mechanisms

Psychological

Pending editorial review.

Behavioral Economic

Yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems.

Neurological

Pending editorial review.

Evolutionary

Pending editorial review.

Sociological

Pending editorial review.

Computational

Pending editorial review.

Systems

Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare.

Inputs (Triggers)

Pending editorial review.

Outputs (Behaviors)

Pending editorial review.

Behavioral Signature

First tier fights about which level is right. Second tier asks what each level is for.

Examples

Everyday
  • Beck & Cowan's leap-of-meaning; takes <5% of the global population, per the original research.
Modern (Organizational)
  • Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare.
Historical

Pending editorial review.

Lab Commentary

Original analysis from The Incentives Lab — how this element behaves inside real payoff structures.

Why this element matters to incentive design

When this element shows up in a diagnostic, the instinct is to train people out of it. Training rarely moves it. The mechanism underneath it is straightforward: yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems. You can recognize it in the field by its signature: first tier fights about which level is right. Second tier asks what each level is for. Every element in the Cognition dimension changes the perceived payoff of an action before the action happens, which is exactly where incentive design has leverage.

How it gets exploited

Left undesigned, senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare. It is amplified whenever senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare. Inside organizations that shows up as senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare. The pattern is the same one Goodhart's Law describes: the measurable proxy attracts the effort, and the purpose behind it quietly loses funding.

How the Lab designs around it

The redesign move is to develop perspective-taking across all six first-tier vMemes before trying to lead change above them. Measure the behavior, not the sentiment. A survey will tell you how people feel about this; only observed action tells you whether it changed.

Famous Experiments

Pending editorial review.

Design Principles

  • Develop perspective-taking across all six first-tier vMemes before trying to lead change above them.

Measurement Approaches

Pending editorial review.

Evidence

Evidence Grade
B (A strongest → E speculative)
Replication
★★★☆☆
Intervention Confidence
3 / 5
Consensus
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Limitations
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Open Research Questions

Pending editorial review.

Primary References

Pending editorial review.

Signature Section

The Perverse Incentive Lens™

How this behavior is exploited — and how to redesign around it.

Exploitation
Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare.
Amplifying Incentives
Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare.
Org Failure Modes
Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare.
Societal Failure Modes
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Ethical Considerations
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Redesign Strategies
Develop perspective-taking across all six first-tier vMemes before trying to lead change above them.
Diagnostic Questions
  • Develop perspective-taking across all six first-tier vMemes before trying to lead change above them.
Warning Signs

Pending editorial review.

Red Flags

Pending editorial review.

Intervention Playbook
Individual
Develop perspective-taking across all six first-tier vMemes before trying to lead change above them.
Team
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Organization
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Policy
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
AI Implications
Detection
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Measurement
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Mitigation
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Responsible Use
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).

Interactive Mini Network

Click any neighbor to re-center the graph and follow the threads of connection.

HBT-COG-0600 · COG
Second-Tier Thinking
STCTCultural Tightness-L…FTFirst-Tier ThinkingInIndividualism-Collec…LCLife Conditions (Gra…PDPower DistanceSDSpiral DynamicsWPWEIRD PopulationsRu10/10/10 RuleWL3-Way Life Optimizat…APAbilene Paradox

Knowledge Graph Neighbors

Auto-linked to the rest of the Human Behavior Taxonomy by family, domain, dimension, and shared keywords.

Where Second-Tier Thinking is cited in the corpus

Questions about Second-Tier Thinking

What is Second-Tier Thinking?
Second-Tier Thinking is yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems. It sits in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™ as element HBT-COG-0600, within the Culture family. The core principle: yellow and Turquoise vMemes — first systems that recognize the legitimacy of all earlier value systems. In incentive terms, it matters because it changes the payoff people perceive before they choose — which means it can be designed for, or exploited.
What is an example of Second-Tier Thinking?
Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare. The Incentives Lab catalogs everyday, organizational, and historical instances of this element on its Human Behavior Taxonomy™ page (HBT-COG-0600).
How is Second-Tier Thinking exploited?
Senior change leaders need second-tier capability or transformation programs become factional warfare.
How do you design around Second-Tier Thinking?
Develop perspective-taking across all six first-tier vMemes before trying to lead change above them.
Which behavioral dimension does Second-Tier Thinking belong to?
Second-Tier Thinking is classified in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™, family "Culture", class "Mental Model". Its permanent identifier is HBT-COG-0600 and its evidence grade is B.

Version History

v1.1.0 · 2026-06-28Initial auto-seed from corpus.