Skip to main content
HBT-COG-0475 · Dimension COG · Cognition

Mimetic Desire (Girard)

We want what others want.

Social·Mental Model·Grade B·draft· enriching…
In one paragraph

Mimetic Desire (Girard) is we want what others want. It sits in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™ as element HBT-COG-0475, within the Social family. The core principle: we want what others want. In incentive terms, it matters because it changes the payoff people perceive before they choose — which means it can be designed for, or exploited.

Scientific Definition

We want what others want.

Plain-English Definition

We want what others want.

Feynman Explanation

Most ambition is borrowed.

Core Principle

We want what others want.

Mechanisms

Psychological

Pending editorial review.

Behavioral Economic

We want what others want.

Neurological

Pending editorial review.

Evolutionary

Pending editorial review.

Sociological

Pending editorial review.

Computational

Pending editorial review.

Systems

Companies copy competitors instead of choosing.

Inputs (Triggers)

Pending editorial review.

Outputs (Behaviors)

Pending editorial review.

Behavioral Signature

Most ambition is borrowed.

Examples

Everyday
  • Career envy. Strategy envy. Product envy.
Modern (Organizational)
  • Companies copy competitors instead of choosing.
Historical

Pending editorial review.

Lab Commentary

Original analysis from The Incentives Lab — how this element behaves inside real payoff structures.

Why this element matters to incentive design

Most organizations meet this element as a personnel problem. It is not one. The mechanism underneath it is straightforward: we want what others want. You can recognize it in the field by its signature: most ambition is borrowed. Every element in the Cognition dimension changes the perceived payoff of an action before the action happens, which is exactly where incentive design has leverage.

How it gets exploited

Left undesigned, companies copy competitors instead of choosing. It is amplified whenever companies copy competitors instead of choosing. Inside organizations that shows up as companies copy competitors instead of choosing. The pattern is the same one Goodhart's Law describes: the measurable proxy attracts the effort, and the purpose behind it quietly loses funding.

How the Lab designs around it

The redesign move is to examine wants for sources. Decide what you'd want with nobody watching. Watch for it at the boundaries: handoffs, promotions, incident reviews, and budget cycles are where this element gets its power.

Famous Experiments

Pending editorial review.

Design Principles

  • Examine wants for sources. Decide what you'd want with nobody watching.

Measurement Approaches

Pending editorial review.

Evidence

Evidence Grade
B (A strongest → E speculative)
Replication
★★★☆☆
Intervention Confidence
3 / 5
Consensus
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Limitations
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Open Research Questions

Pending editorial review.

Primary References

Pending editorial review.

Signature Section

The Perverse Incentive Lens™

How this behavior is exploited — and how to redesign around it.

Exploitation
Companies copy competitors instead of choosing.
Amplifying Incentives
Companies copy competitors instead of choosing.
Org Failure Modes
Companies copy competitors instead of choosing.
Societal Failure Modes
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Ethical Considerations
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Redesign Strategies
Examine wants for sources. Decide what you'd want with nobody watching.
Diagnostic Questions
  • Examine wants for sources. Decide what you'd want with nobody watching.
Warning Signs

Pending editorial review.

Red Flags

Pending editorial review.

Intervention Playbook
Individual
Examine wants for sources. Decide what you'd want with nobody watching.
Team
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Organization
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Policy
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
AI Implications
Detection
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Measurement
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Mitigation
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Responsible Use
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).

Interactive Mini Network

Click any neighbor to re-center the graph and follow the threads of connection.

HBT-COG-0475 · COG
Mimetic Desire (Girard)
MDAPAbilene ParadoxADActon's DictumABActor-Observer BiasALAffinity / Liking BiasAlAltruismAsAstroturfingAPAttitude PolarizationABAttribution BiasBEBarnum EffectBJBecause Justification

Knowledge Graph Neighbors

Where Mimetic Desire (Girard) is cited in the corpus

Questions about Mimetic Desire (Girard)

What is Mimetic Desire (Girard)?
Mimetic Desire (Girard) is we want what others want. It sits in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™ as element HBT-COG-0475, within the Social family. The core principle: we want what others want. In incentive terms, it matters because it changes the payoff people perceive before they choose — which means it can be designed for, or exploited.
What is an example of Mimetic Desire (Girard)?
Companies copy competitors instead of choosing. The Incentives Lab catalogs everyday, organizational, and historical instances of this element on its Human Behavior Taxonomy™ page (HBT-COG-0475).
How is Mimetic Desire (Girard) exploited?
Companies copy competitors instead of choosing.
How do you design around Mimetic Desire (Girard)?
Examine wants for sources. Decide what you'd want with nobody watching.
Which behavioral dimension does Mimetic Desire (Girard) belong to?
Mimetic Desire (Girard) is classified in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™, family "Social", class "Mental Model". Its permanent identifier is HBT-COG-0475 and its evidence grade is B.

Version History

v1.1.0 · 2026-06-28Initial auto-seed from corpus.