Skip to main content
HBT-COG-0323 · Dimension COG · Cognition

Fixes That Fail

A solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run.

Systems·Mental Model·Grade B·draft· enriching…
In one paragraph

Fixes That Fail is a solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run. It sits in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™ as element HBT-COG-0323, within the Systems family. The core principle: a solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run. In incentive terms, it matters because it changes the payoff people perceive before they choose — which means it can be designed for, or exploited.

Scientific Definition

A solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run.

Plain-English Definition

A solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run.

Feynman Explanation

If you've solved the same problem three times, you haven't solved it once.

Core Principle

A solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run.

Mechanisms

Psychological

Pending editorial review.

Behavioral Economic

A solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run.

Neurological

Pending editorial review.

Evolutionary

Pending editorial review.

Sociological

Pending editorial review.

Computational

Pending editorial review.

Systems

The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments.

Inputs (Triggers)

Pending editorial review.

Outputs (Behaviors)

Pending editorial review.

Behavioral Signature

If you've solved the same problem three times, you haven't solved it once.

Examples

Everyday
  • Cutting maintenance to hit a quarter → equipment fails next year → larger cost.
Modern (Organizational)
  • The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments.
Historical

Pending editorial review.

Lab Commentary

Original analysis from The Incentives Lab — how this element behaves inside real payoff structures.

Why this element matters to incentive design

This element is common enough to feel like human nature and specific enough to be engineered around. The mechanism underneath it is straightforward: a solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run. You can recognize it in the field by its signature: if you've solved the same problem three times, you haven't solved it once. Every element in the Cognition dimension changes the perceived payoff of an action before the action happens, which is exactly where incentive design has leverage.

How it gets exploited

Left undesigned, the structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments. It is amplified whenever the structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments. Inside organizations that shows up as the structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments. The pattern is the same one Goodhart's Law describes: the measurable proxy attracts the effort, and the purpose behind it quietly loses funding.

How the Lab designs around it

The redesign move is to for any quick fix, name the second-order consequence in writing. Re-read it in 6 months. The test of any redesign here is simple: after the change, can you name what the organization is now doing less of? If not, the payoff structure did not actually move.

Famous Experiments

Pending editorial review.

Design Principles

  • For any quick fix, name the second-order consequence in writing. Re-read it in 6 months.

Measurement Approaches

Pending editorial review.

Evidence

Evidence Grade
B (A strongest → E speculative)
Replication
★★★☆☆
Intervention Confidence
3 / 5
Consensus
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Limitations
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Open Research Questions

Pending editorial review.

Primary References

Pending editorial review.

Signature Section

The Perverse Incentive Lens™

How this behavior is exploited — and how to redesign around it.

Exploitation
The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments.
Amplifying Incentives
The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments.
Org Failure Modes
The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments.
Societal Failure Modes
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Ethical Considerations
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Redesign Strategies
For any quick fix, name the second-order consequence in writing. Re-read it in 6 months.
Diagnostic Questions
  • For any quick fix, name the second-order consequence in writing. Re-read it in 6 months.
Warning Signs

Pending editorial review.

Red Flags

Pending editorial review.

Intervention Playbook
Individual
For any quick fix, name the second-order consequence in writing. Re-read it in 6 months.
Team
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Organization
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Policy
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
AI Implications
Detection
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Measurement
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Mitigation
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).
Responsible Use
Pending editorial review (HBT v1.0 auto-seed).

Interactive Mini Network

Click any neighbor to re-center the graph and follow the threads of connection.

HBT-COG-0323 · COG
Fixes That Fail
FTAlAlloyingBoBottleneckBoBottlenecksBWBroken Windows TheoryBLBrook's LawBLBrooks's LawCaCatalystCTChaos TheoryCRChemical ReactionsCLConway's Law

Knowledge Graph Neighbors

Where Fixes That Fail is cited in the corpus

Questions about Fixes That Fail

What is Fixes That Fail?
Fixes That Fail is a solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run. It sits in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™ as element HBT-COG-0323, within the Systems family. The core principle: a solution works in the short run and creates a worse version of the original problem in the long run. In incentive terms, it matters because it changes the payoff people perceive before they choose — which means it can be designed for, or exploited.
What is an example of Fixes That Fail?
The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments. The Incentives Lab catalogs everyday, organizational, and historical instances of this element on its Human Behavior Taxonomy™ page (HBT-COG-0323).
How is Fixes That Fail exploited?
The structural source of most 'why are we doing this again?' moments.
How do you design around Fixes That Fail?
For any quick fix, name the second-order consequence in writing. Re-read it in 6 months.
Which behavioral dimension does Fixes That Fail belong to?
Fixes That Fail is classified in the Cognition dimension (COG) of the Human Behavior Taxonomy™, family "Systems", class "Mental Model". Its permanent identifier is HBT-COG-0323 and its evidence grade is B.

Version History

v1.1.0 · 2026-06-28Initial auto-seed from corpus.